- Mission & Vision
- Our Core Values
- PWF in The Media
- Board of Directors
- Social Media Outreach
- Join our Mailing List
- Contact Us
- Research History
- Our Research Team
- Research Internships
- Current Studies
- Australia Research
- Abundance, Survival, Recruitment, and Realized Growth Rates of East Australia Humpback Whales
- Calving Rates and Intervals of East Australian Female Humpback Whales
- Connectivity and Interchange Between Humpback Whale Aggregation Areas along East Australia
- Match My Whale - a Humpback Whale Fluke Identification Project
- PWF’s Southern Hemisphere Humpback Whale Catalog
- Rate of Interchange Between East Australia and West Australia Humpback Whales
- Ecuador Research
- Hawaii Research
- Distribution and Accumulation of Marine Debris: Implications for Cetaceans
- Great Whale Count
- Hawaiian Humpback Whale Catalog
- Odontocete Distribution, Abundance, and Life Histories.
- Social Structure of False Killer Whales in Maui Four-Island Region
- Surprise Encounters with Humpback Whales
- Whale and Dolphin Tracker
- Other Projects
- Australia Research
- Donate to Help Fund our Research
- Donate Your Whale or Dolphin Photos
- Migaloo the White Humpback Whale
- You Can Help
- Become a Member / Renew Membership
- Donate Now
- Donation Specials
- Other Ways You Can Donate
- Adopt a Whale, Dolphin, Turtle or False Killer Whale
- Whale Regatta
- Maui Whale Festival Events
- Sponsor Run & Walk for the Whales
- Sponsor World Whale Day
- Made on Maui Fair Vendor Application
- Book an Eco-Cruise
- Choose PWF
- Ocean Store
Posted on: August 31, 2010
Pacific Whale Foundation Chief Scientist Speaks Out on Whaling
Thanks to the generous support of so many of our members, Greg Kaufman, Founder and Chief Scientist of Pacific Whale Foundation, recently participated in the International Whaling Commission's Scientific Committee in Agadir, Morocco as an Invited Participant.
You can read his report about the Scientific Commitee meeting by clicking here. You can also access the IWC's report, "Proposed Consensus Decision1 to Improve the Conservation of Whales from the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Commission" here.
Included below is a commentary that Greg also wrote about the International Whaling Commission meeting and the controversial proposal to legitimize commercial whaling.
You can also read Greg Kaufman's comments about the International Whaling Commission on Pacific Whale Foundationâ€™s Facebook page. You don't have to join Facebook to view it. Simply click here or use this URL: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pacific-Whale-Foundation/109925212362570
Pacific Whale Foundation's Ecuador Research Director, Cristina Castro, PhD, is currently at the International Whaling Commission meeting as a member of Ecuador's voting delegation. It's expected that a vote will be taken within the week on whether or not to legitimize commercial whaling. We are grateful that our members and supporters have made it possible for Cristina Castro to attend this crucial meeting. To learn more, click here.
Read more on our Action Alert by clicking here or visiting http://www.pacificwhale.org/issues/issues_details.php?id=387.
Whale of a Mistake
by Greg Kaufman
The International Whaling Commissionâ€™s proposed â€œConsensus Decision to Improve the Conservation of Whalesâ€ has little to do with either consensus or conservation. This proposal is simply a not-so-well-disguised attempt to legitimize whale killing.
While purporting to â€œbring an end to two decades of whaling effectively outside international controlâ€, it actually rewards those who have been killing whales illegally â€“ namely Japan, Iceland and Norway. This â€˜Gang of 3â€™ have slaughtered over 30,000 whales since a worldwide moratorium on whaling was adopted by the IWC in 1986. Under the proposed â€œConsensus Decisionâ€ these whaling nations will be able to catch a total of 1,800 whales a year including two endangered species, fin and sei.
The â€˜carrotâ€™ in this deal is that for these three whaling nations (and supposedly only these three nations) they will receive fresh new kill quotas established for the next ten years on minke whales, sei and fin whales, with the possibility of sperm whales. The â€˜stickâ€™ is these whaling countries will relinquish their so-called â€˜rightsâ€™ under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. These supposed â€˜rightsâ€™ include catching whales for scientific purposes (Japan) or under objection or reservation to the moratorium on commercial whaling that was adopted by the IWC in 1982 (Iceland and Norway).
Herein lies the problem: the proposed â€œConsensus Decisionâ€ simply kicks the whale meat can down the road ten years. It does not nothing to phase out whaling, instead provides a re-evaluation period. There are no assurances the whalers will stick to their quotas or allotted species. And there is no assurance that legalizing whaling will reduce illegal harvesting. Quite frankly the IWC has no â€˜legal authorityâ€™ to enforce its rules or stop countries from whaling. The IWC can just toss you out of their whale club, or in the case of Japan, you simply threaten to take you harpoons and go home â€“ and hunt whales as you please.
The proposal does nothing to deal with a new form of emerging whaling â€“ â€œaccidentallyâ€ catching whales in near-shore fishing nets off the coasts of Japan and South Korea. This so-called â€˜bycatch whalingâ€™ kills as many whales each year as Japanâ€™s scientific whaling program, about 150. Bycatch whaling has grown into a lucrative trade where the price of an adult minke whale fetches as much as $100,000 in the whale meat markets.
One key initiative arising from the IWCâ€™s Scientific Committee meetings in Agadir, Morocco (May 30 â€“ June 11) was that â€˜bycatchâ€™ killings must be counted as part of the new proposed kill quotas. Needless to say, the whalers did not meet such a logical notion with great joy.
The IWCâ€™s move to legitimize whaling is not based on sound science or responsible management procedure; it is simply an attempt to reign in renegade members. But this task may be akin to herding cats. On the first day of Scientific Committee meetings Korea defiantly announced, â€œIf quotas will be set for whales, we will be asking for our share.â€ So much for allowing only the â€˜Gang of 3â€™ whaling nations to slaughter whales.
Where is the U.S. delegation in these discussions? Compromised. While saying â€œSave the Whalesâ€ out of one side of their collective mouths, our commissioners will also be requesting new kill quotas for the highly endangered bowhead whale for â€œaboriginal hunting purposesâ€: 670 whales â€˜struckâ€™ (harpooned) and 580 â€˜landedâ€™ (killed) over 10 seasons from 2011-2020. Talk about â€œhaving it your wayâ€.
On June 21st the IWC will open its 62nd meeting in Agadir, Morocco. The fate of thousands of whales, the commercial whaling moratorium and the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary is at stake. It is time for closure on this issue. Time to put an end to status quo, allowing the â€˜Gang of 3â€™ to catch whales outside of IWC control. Put an end to the nonsensical discussions surrounding the faulty â€œConsensus Decision." It is time to put an end to whaling once and forever.